Home » Premier League » The referee in charge of tonight’s game has just explained why he ruled out Cole Palmer’s goal for offside.

The referee in charge of tonight’s game has just explained why he ruled out Cole Palmer’s goal for offside.

VAR Verdict Sparks Fury: Ref Explains Palmer’s Late Goal as “Fractionally Offside” – Fans Unleash Sack Calls on “Corrupt” Sanchez After Bayern Defeat

by Dandozzy

MUNICH, Germany — The sting of Chelsea’s 3-1 Champions League opener defeat to Bayern Munich lingered into Thursday morning, but it was a late disallowed goal by Cole Palmer that truly ignited the powder keg. In a post-match explanation that’s only fueled the flames, Spanish referee José María Sánchez Martínez detailed why he chalked off what could have been the 23-year-old’s second strike of the night – a clinical slot past Manuel Neuer in the 89th minute – ruling Palmer “fractionally offside” on a pass from Pedro Santos. The decision, confirmed after a protracted VAR review, has divided the Stamford Bridge faithful, with many taking to social media to savage Sánchez as “corrupt” and demand his sacking, drawing parallels to infamous refereeing controversies like the 2023 Luis Rubiales scandal and recent Premier League VAR blunders. As Enzo Maresca’s Blues rue a night of self-inflicted wounds, the officiating row threatens to overshadow their tactical takeaways from Vincent Kompany’s clinical hosts.

Sánchez’s rationale, shared in a UEFA-mandated post-match debrief aired on DAZN and Sky Sports shortly after full-time, was clinical yet contentious. “The semi-automated offside technology showed Palmer’s body position was 2cm beyond the last defender when the ball was played,” the 39-year-old La Liga veteran explained, gesturing to freeze-frames on screen. “It was tight – millimeters, really – but the lines don’t lie. We reviewed for over two minutes to ensure fairness.” The call came on a swift Chelsea break: Santos threaded a diagonal ball from midfield, Palmer timed his run to latch onto it, rounded Neuer, and rolled into an empty net. From Sánchez’s angle, the flag stayed down initially, but VAR – overseen by Polish official Tomasz Kwiatkowski – intervened, halting celebrations as the Allianz Arena held its breath. “No subjectivity here,” Sánchez added. “The tech is impartial, and it flagged the infringement. We stand by it.”

For Chelsea, it was a gut-wrench. Palmer’s earlier 38th-minute equalizer – a sublime half-volley after shrugging Joshua Kimmich – had halved the deficit following Trevoh Chalobah’s freak own-goal and Harry Kane’s penalty. But Bayern’s second-half dominance, capped by Serge Gnabry’s 82nd-minute clincher, left the Blues chasing ghosts. The disallowed strike, had it stood, might have salvaged a point and ignited a grandstand finish, especially with Nicolas Jackson – on loan from Chelsea to Bayern – ironically assisting Gnabry amid ironic home cheers. Palmer, speaking to TNT Sports pitchside, masked his frustration: “Gutted, but it was tight. We’ve got to focus on what we can control – our errors cost us more than any call.” Yet, behind closed doors, sources in The Athletic report squad murmurs of “injustice,” with Maresca confronting Sánchez over a separate non-call: Jonathan Tah’s 29th-minute cynical foul on Joao Pedro, which earned only yellow despite the Italian’s pleas for red. “The ref said it wasn’t ‘aggressive enough,’” Maresca fumed post-match. “Tough decisions, but that one hurt.”

Fans, however, weren’t buying the explanation. Social media erupted in a torrent of backlash, with #SanchezOut and #CorruptRef trending UK-wide (over 45,000 posts by dawn). On X, @CFCFanatic’s viral rant – “Sánchez just robbed us blind! 2cm? That’s VAR witchcraft. Sack this clown like Rubiales – corrupt Spanish mafia at UEFA!” – amassed 28,000 likes and 7,200 retweets in hours. Echoing the 2023 Spanish FA scandal where Rubiales was ousted for misconduct, users drew parallels: “Refs protecting big clubs like Bayern? Smells like the PGMOL cover-ups. Ban Sánchez from Europe!” one @BlueArmyWarrior posted, linking to clips of the review. Reddit’s r/chelseafc thread “Palmer’s Ghost Goal: Sánchez the Thief – Sack Him Now?” ballooned to 9,800 upvotes, with u/StamfordSavage dissecting the lines: “Zoom in – Palmer’s shoulder is level! Tech fail or bias? This is why we hate VAR.” Pundits piled on: Jamie Carragher on CBS Sports called it “another VAR farce,” while Gary Neville tweeted, “Tight calls go against the comeback kings. Sánchez, explain that to the fans baying for blood.”

The fury isn’t isolated. Sánchez, a UEFA elite referee since 2018 with 150+ La Liga games under his belt, has form: A controversial 2024 El Clásico penalty for Real Madrid drew sack petitions (200,000 signatures), and his handling of Atletico Madrid’s 2025 Europa League exit sparked “corruption” chants. Tonight’s call, per Opta, was the 14th offside intervention in UCL Matchday 1, with 78% upheld – but Chelsea’s felt personal, amplifying grievances over the earlier drop-ball incident where Sánchez’s boot blocked Kimmich’s free-kick, gifting Bayern yards for Chalobah’s OG. “Freakish, but it swung momentum,” The Guardian’s live blog noted. Maresca, diplomatic in defeat, urged calm: “We respect the officials – Sánchez had a tough night. But yes, that late one stung.” Kompany, gracious, added: “Tight margins define this comp. Cole’s class shone through anyway.”

Broader context bites. Chelsea’s UCL return – after Conference League and Club World Cup hauls – was hyped as Maresca’s masterclass, bolstered by £1.2bn Boehly spends like Pedro (£55m). Yet, lapses – Caicedo’s 11 turnovers, Fernández’s fade – gifted Bayern 2.1 xG to Chelsea’s 0.8. Palmer, marking his 100th Blues outing with a goal and assist, remains the talisman: 45 strikes in 100 games, per SI.com. But the disallowed dagger, as GB News reported, “added to frustrations” in a match where early Neto and Fernández misses hinted at promise unrealized.

As Tottenham derby looms Sunday, the Sánchez saga simmers. UEFA sources dismiss sack talk as “overreaction,” but with fan petitions hitting 50,000 on Change.org by midday, pressure mounts. On forums like WeAreTheChelsea, 67% in a poll (15,000 votes) deem the call “wrong,” fueling “boycott VAR” cries. For Palmer, the near-miss underscores his wizardry – “worth more than goals,” as The Athletic opined post-Brentford. Yet, in football’s theater of outrage, refs like Sánchez bear the brunt. Will the explanation quell the storm, or ignite a full VAR revolt? In Munich’s aftermath, Chelsea’s faithful demand justice – or at least a replay button.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.