Even though Diogo Jota scored in the 23rd minute, Chelsea argued that they should have been awarded a penalty kick before the goal was scored.
Due to the decision of the referee, the video assistant referee (VAR) did not award a penalty for the collision that occurred between Conor Gallagher and Virgil van Dijk within the penalty area.
A number of Chelsea supporters voiced their dissatisfaction on the X platform, asking why the incident was not considered a penalty and drawing attention to Liverpool’s use of the video assistant referee unit.
For the influence that they had on the game, the judgments that the video assistant referee (VAR) made for Liverpool were criticized by a number of people as being unreasonable, while others referred to them as ludicrous.
In addition to making Chelsea’s situation even more difficult, Conor Bradley scored just before halftime, which significantly extended Liverpool’s lead.
The Premier League is reportedly preparing significant changes to the video assistant referee system for the upcoming season as a result of the controversies that occurred during the current season.
Ongoing disputes, including as goals that were disallowed and decisions about handball that were questioned, have prompted calls for improvements to be made to the video assistant referee.
In a handball incident that occurred between Liverpool and Arsenal, the PGMOL chief, Howard Webb, admitted that he made a mistake by not awarding Liverpool a penalty.
There has been a lot of outrage regarding the decisions made by the VAR, which has led to conversations about the necessity of reforms.
The confession of faults has also contributed to the desire for improvements.
The word “LiVARpool” expresses the displeasure that fans feel and emphasizes the scrutiny that is placed on Liverpool’s decisions regarding the use of video assistant referees.
While the Premier League is contemplating changes, the focus continues to be on the influence that controversy surrounding video assistant referees (VAR) has had on the dynamics of football matches.
This has prompted a more comprehensive discussion over the function and efficiency of technology in the refereeing process.